One GP in Seven Warns of Dangerous Local Hospital Department

One GP in seven regards a local hospital department as dangerously substandard according to a major survey providing evidence that in a significant minority of hospitals patients are dying because of failings in care.


As many as a third of 500 GPs responding to the survey conducted by Pulse with sister title Practical Commissioning - said they believed a patient had received dangerously poor care at their local hospital in the last year.

Some 10% of GPs said one of their patients had died in the last year potentially as a result of substandard hospital care, with complaints over missed diagnoses, dangerously early discharge and poor emergency care.

A third of GPs had raised concerns with their local hospital in the last year, in some cases with letters to clinical standards teams, but fewer than half felt confident that concerns would be acted upon.

Overall, 64% of GPs rated hospitals clinical care as good or very good, but only 38% did so for communication and personal care, and 44% for speed and efficiency. Problems included substandard nursing care for elderly patients, delays to follow-up appointments and patients discharged so prematurely GPs could no longer rely upon in-patient care being complete.

Some 78% of GPs would recommend their local hospital to patients, but 20% said they had confidentially warned patients about its care in the last year, and 21% would not trust it with their family.

Some 15% said whole hospital departments were dangerously sub-standard, with A&E departments most often cited.

A GP in Oxford, who asked to remain anonymous, said their practice raised the alarm over three serious missed diagnoses by the gynaecological department at the John Radcliffe Hospital, including one of ovarian cancer.

I think the patient with cancer has died, the GP said. We wrote a letter. All we wanted was something back saying lets look at this. Instead we got a five-sentence reply saying under NICE guidelines we did nothing negligent.

An Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust spokesperson said: The trust is confident about our services, but not complacent. If a GP feels our care falls short, we would urge them to raise this.

Dr Peter Livingstone, a GP in Glasgow, said he raised concerns over dangerous premature discharge: A patient had been admitted on Saturday and discharged on Sunday. A chest X-ray had found left broncho pneumonia. When I saw him he was unresponsive, his pulse was running too fast, he had a fever and his blood pressure was down. They turfed him out thinking a nursing home would look after him. That is substandard care I worry he may have died.

A GP in the East Midlands blamed an elderly patients death on substandard care: He fell out of bed and fractured his hip. It wasnt picked up, complications set in and he died. The patients who dont do very well are the elderly.

A GP in Romford, south London, said his practice now re-referred a quarter of patients due to his local hospital discharging them on target driven, not clinical criteria: I have written to the chief executive to say if I had my way I would not refer a single patient to her institution.

Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust said: We take GPs concerns very seriously and are working with our clinical forum on a quality improvement programme.

The Department of Health said: Unsafe care will not be tolerated. We are developing patient safety measures which will show the outcomes of care.

Richard Hoey, editor of Pulse, said: The recent summing-up of the Mid Staffs public inquiry was clear that key features of the trusts failure were replicated to a significant degree more broadly across the NHS and that the tendency within the DH to view Mid Staffs as an isolated example is dangerous.

Our survey results demonstrate that in a significant minority of NHS hospitals, GPs have Mid Staffs-like concerns over the quality and safety of care in particular over poor standards of personal care, and A&E departments that at times are plain dangerous. The results shouldnt detract from the very good quality of care in most NHS hospitals, but they suggest the minority which are bad and unsafe is larger than the Government might like to admit.


qr code
About The Operating Theatre Journal

The Operating Theatre Journal, OTJ, is published monthly and distributed to every hospital operating theatre department in the UK. The distribution includes both the National Health Service and the Private Sector.

More »
Follow & Share

Follow The Operating Theatre Journal on Facebook Follow The Operating Theatre Journal on Twitter Follow The Operating Theatre Journal on LinkedIn Follow The Operating Theatre Journal RSS Feed

Help & Support

Problems with, or comments about, this website may be emailed to:

Get in touch

Telephone: +44 (0)2921 680068
Skype: Lawrand Ltd
Email: admin@lawrand.com